By Steven Gan, CPA, CCE
I was having a discussion the other
day with an associate of mine and this subject came up. To be honest
with you, I really don't know the answer to this question. In over the
30 years I've been in the collection business, I've worked with hundreds
of people and have observed the collection techniques, styles,
approaches, and psychology of both genders. However, let me take a
moment to outline some of the differences of each that I've observed and
see what you think.
1) It appears to me that my female
colleagues have a tendency to listen more carefully, take clearer notes,
and wait for a pause in the conversation before responding to a debtor.
This is especially important since before we can grapple with the
reasons why a debtor can't or won't pay, we need to at least understand a
complete picture of the situation.
2) I have sometimes observed
some of my male colleagues of being a little bit too aggressive. Rather
than listening to the debtor's reasons for non-payment, there may be
some impatience to put everything aside and get right down to "when
payment will be made and how much". When this kind of situation occurs,
the collector may be missing an opportunity to just let the debtor "get
something off of his/her chest", which could then make them feel better
and ready to communicate on the matter.
3) I think when it comes
to dealing with a very difficult debtor, it really comes down to case
by case. Sometimes a male debtor who is upset will calm down more by
speaking with a woman. The converse is also true in that an irate male
debtor may feel more comfortable speaking with a male collector. There
are many factors involved such as the tone of voice, the speed of the
speech, and the ability of the collector to establish a level of
comfortability in communicating together.
4) It seems to me that
female collectors do not get quite as frustrated when having to
follow-up and stay after debtors who break promises to pay. They have a
tendency to accept the follow-up process as more or less part of the
job. However, I think that male collectors may channel their frustration
into an imparting sense of urgency that the debtor fulfill their
payment obligation.
5) I am going to go out on a limb here with
this observation but I believe that male collectors just edge out their
female counterparts when it comes to negotiating techniques, especially
when the male collector is dealing with a very seasoned male business
professional (debtor). When I use the term negotiating techniques, I am
referring to the ability to stay focused against the reasons that a
debtor may use to maneuver out of the payment obligation.
6) At
the same time, I think that female collectors can be more creative when
it comes to providing or suggesting payment routes that will help to
resolve a debt situation in which the debtor has the will and volition
to pay, but not the capacity. I remember one very creative female
collector who found a buyer to purchase the debtor's inventory as a way
to pay off the creditor's claim.
7) This one may also be a
little bit contentious but I've found that female collectors are more
open to changes in the collection system and just wanting to learn more
and advance higher up into the profession. As you may know, the
collection industry is one of the fields that employs a very high
percentage of women.
8) Point (7) leads me to the feeling that
women in our industry tend to stay in the industry much longer and work
at one company for a greater period of time than their male
counterparts.
Perhaps with the above points I might be leaning
towards women as better collectors but as this really is very
subjective, I would greatly appreciate hearing your thoughts on whether
women or men make better debt collectors.
All Rights Reserved
Why you think that there is such dependency that men or woman are better dbet collectors? I think it srongly depent on the character no matter which gender :)
ReplyDelete